ArticleSociology of health & illness2026
In Search of Genetic Agency: On the Uses and Actionability of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results in Biohacking Practices.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The article examines why and with what consequences biohacking individuals use direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC GTs). Based on thematic coding of 15 semi-structured interviews, it argues that these users generally see themselves as capable of generating actionable knowledge to optimise future health by manipulating their 'milieu'. DTC GTs are integrated into this perspective as a knowledge technology for prevention and optimisation. However, informants often find it difficult to translate DTC test results into concrete action and the study identifies their different strategies for making this type of knowledge actionable. These include monitoring risk conditions, changing or reinforcing existing lifestyle practices, engaging in trial-and-error experimentation or postponing action whilst awaiting more advanced knowledge. The article furthermore outlines the relational dilemmas experienced by the informants as a type of consequence of taking DTC GTs. Overall, the article shows the various ways that a highly knowledge-oriented user group navigates DTC test results by relying on an 'epigenetic imaginary' that reframes genetic risk as open to intervention, but also how it struggles to close the gap between test results and the health-optimising actions that are so central for biohacking practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.