Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446044›Full record

ArticleBiomedical chromatography : BMC2026

Development of Liquid-Liquid Extraction-Assisted, Derivatization-Free Gas Chromatography Integrated With the Flame Ionization Detection (GC-FID) Method for the Direct Determination of Fatty Acids in Cream Formulations.

Ruchi Bhatia, Deepti Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical chromatography : BMC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruchi BhatiaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-3046
Deepti JainSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marketed cream formulations contain fatty acids as core constituents, required for its texture, uniformity, shelf life, and skin penetration. Given their importance in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries, real-time quantification and analysis of these compounds are crucial for assessing authenticity and ensuring compliance with regulatory specifications. In the present analysis, we employed gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) due to its sensitivity, robustness, and quantitative reliability. Overcoming the traditional method for fatty acid determination, we analyzed the sample without derivatization to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). The derivatization step was initially omitted to simplify sample preparation, reduce analysis time and reagent consumption, and minimize the potential errors associated with incomplete esterification or degradation of unstable fatty acids during derivatization. Direct analysis was performed by dissolving the extracted sample in isopropyl alcohol and then filtering and injecting it into the GC-FID system under optimized chromatographic conditions. The optimized method was used for the concurrent quantification of lauric, myristic, palmitic, oleic, and stearic acids. The validation of the present work was executed in alignment with ICH Q2(R1) requirements. The method was further expanded to analyze real cream samples, thereby validating the accuracy of fatty acid profiling for routine quality control.

Indexed as

Fatty AcidsLiquid-Liquid ExtractionChromatography, GasFlame IonizationLimit of DetectionLinear ModelsReproducibility of ResultsFatty Acidscream formulationsfatty acidsflame ionizationgas chromatographyquantification

Identifiers

PMID42446044
PMCPMC13367021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.