ArticleJournal of food science2026
Sensitive Detection of Foodborne Parasitic Larvae Using a Sieving-qPCR Workflow: Application to Angiostrongylus cantonensis.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contaminated food and water represent potential infection sources of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, a parasitic nematode with significant zoonotic potential. Limited environmental surveillance may be due to the absence of simple and reliable screening methods. Different methods of A. cantonensis DNA detection were evaluated on lamb's lettuce (Valerianella locusta). First, three methods for concentrating larvae from water samples spiked with 1 and 10 third-stage larvae (L3) were compared: simple sedimentation and two sieving techniques. Then, two DNA extraction modifications were assessed on spiked lettuce samples. Lastly, the detection limit was evaluated using lettuce samples spiked with 1, 5, 10, 20, and 50 L3. Method efficiency was assessed using a sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The highest DNA yields were obtained using a sieving method with a direct sieve DNA extraction employing glass beads and chelating resin. Using this approach, the detection limit was determined to be a single L3 in 50 g of lamb's lettuce. Detection was successful from both the sieve-retained material and the sedimented flow-through. Sieving techniques provide a promising screening approach for detecting larval stages of parasites, such as A. cantonensis in vegetables. Combined with a sensitive qPCR, detection was consistently achieved at 1 L3 under controlled conditions. Detection of parasite DNA in environmental samples indicates a potential health risk and supports the applicability of this method for food safety monitoring, with possible adaptation to other vegetables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.