Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445925›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Economic evaluation of including the EV71 vaccine in the national immunization program: a modeling study in Guangxi, China.

Quan He, Xiaoting Liao, Linlin Deng, Zhengqin Su, Weiwen Zhou, Yi Mo, Xiong Zou, Caifang Li, Yong Lv, Caitong He and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Quan He *School of Public Health and Management, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Xiaoting Liao *School of Public Health and Management, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Linlin Deng *Sterile Supply Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Zhengqin SuSchool of Public Health and Management, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Weiwen ZhouImmunization Planning Institute, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
Yi MoVaccine Clinical Research Institute, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
Xiong ZouThe Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Caifang LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Yong LvDepartment of Pediatrics, Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Caitong HeYulin Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yulin, China.
Haibin WeiDevelopment Planning Department, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Hai LiSchool of Public Health and Management, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) remains a major public health concern among children in China, particularly in those under 5 years of age. Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is the leading cause of severe cases and mortality. Although EV71 vaccines are highly effective, they are currently self-paid in China, and evidence on publicly funded strategies remains limited. This study evaluated the health and economic impact of including the EV71 vaccine in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in Guangxi from a societal perspective, incorporating both direct medical costs and indirect productivity losses. Methods: A decision tree-Markov model simulated a cohort of 420,000 newborns over a 5-year horizon. Two strategies were compared: NIP inclusion (free vaccination) and the current self-paid approach. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses were conducted, with outcomes including incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. Results: Compared with the self-paid strategy, NIP inclusion increased vaccination by 344,190 individuals and prevented 14,234 HFMD cases and 16 deaths. Disease-related costs decreased by USD 10.15 million, while vaccination costs increased by USD 19.71 million (BCR = 0.515). The intervention yielded 1,260.8 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with an ICER of USD 8,319.99/QALY, approximately 1.005 times the per capita GDP of Guangxi, indicating acceptable cost-effectiveness. Vaccine price was the most influential parameter; reducing the price to USD 14.94 per dose would achieve cost-benefit balance. Conclusions: Including the EV71 vaccine in the NIP would substantially reduce HFMD burden and is cost-effective. Price reductions could further improve economic outcomes and enable net societal benefits, supporting policy decisions in China and similar settings.

Indexed as

Enterovirus A, HumanHand, Foot and Mouth DiseaseImmunization ProgramsViral VaccinesChild, PreschoolChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMarkov ChainsModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsViral Vaccinescost–benefit analysiscost-effectiveness analysisdecision tree–Markov modelEV71health economicsHFMDnational immunization programvaccination policy

Identifiers

PMID42445925
PMCPMC13357617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.