ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Economic evaluation of including the EV71 vaccine in the national immunization program: a modeling study in Guangxi, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) remains a major public health concern among children in China, particularly in those under 5 years of age. Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is the leading cause of severe cases and mortality. Although EV71 vaccines are highly effective, they are currently self-paid in China, and evidence on publicly funded strategies remains limited. This study evaluated the health and economic impact of including the EV71 vaccine in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in Guangxi from a societal perspective, incorporating both direct medical costs and indirect productivity losses. Methods: A decision tree-Markov model simulated a cohort of 420,000 newborns over a 5-year horizon. Two strategies were compared: NIP inclusion (free vaccination) and the current self-paid approach. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses were conducted, with outcomes including incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. Results: Compared with the self-paid strategy, NIP inclusion increased vaccination by 344,190 individuals and prevented 14,234 HFMD cases and 16 deaths. Disease-related costs decreased by USD 10.15 million, while vaccination costs increased by USD 19.71 million (BCR = 0.515). The intervention yielded 1,260.8 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with an ICER of USD 8,319.99/QALY, approximately 1.005 times the per capita GDP of Guangxi, indicating acceptable cost-effectiveness. Vaccine price was the most influential parameter; reducing the price to USD 14.94 per dose would achieve cost-benefit balance. Conclusions: Including the EV71 vaccine in the NIP would substantially reduce HFMD burden and is cost-effective. Price reductions could further improve economic outcomes and enable net societal benefits, supporting policy decisions in China and similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.