Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445921›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Perinatal wellbeing through restoring healthy family systems in a nêhiyaw (Plains Cree) community: a mixed methods study.

Richard T Oster, Luwana Listener, Denise Young, Marisa Saddleback, Patrick Lightning, Lea Bill, Winnie Chow-Horn, Mandi Gray, Juliette R Bedard, Rhonda C Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard T OsterDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Luwana ListenerDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Denise YoungDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Marisa SaddlebackDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Patrick LightningDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Lea BillAlberta First Nations Information Governance Centre, Tsuut'ina, AB, Canada.
Winnie Chow-HornDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mandi GrayDepartment of Sociology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada.
Juliette R BedardWomen and Children's Health Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Rhonda C BellDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A collaborative research partnership in Alberta (Canada) was formed with the goal of supporting optimal health during the perinatal period for diverse Indigenous populations. Our approach utilized community-led strategies that promote the best possible healthy life for families and children. This partnership was guided by a Restoring and Supporting Healthy Family Systems (RSHFS) conceptual model based primarily on Indigenous ways of knowing. We sought to explore components of the RSHFS model with members of a nêhiyaw (Plains Cree) community of childbearing age, focused on refining codesigned perinatal strategies and supports for women and families. Methods: We utilized a convergent parallel mixed methods design. In collaboration with nêhiyaw community members, we developed and implemented a survey for women of childbearing age and their partners. Follow-up semistructured interviews were carried out. Data generation approaches were guided by the RSHFS model that incorporates seven interrelated elements: identity, supportive environments, culture, language, grandfathers and grandmothers, fathers and mothers, and extended family. Results: Fifty-two participants completed the survey and seven completed the interviews. All seven domains of the RSHFS model were found to be salient and interconnected influences on perinatal wellbeing. Participants emphasized the importance of supportive family relationships and connections to culture, language, identity, and land, while also describing the ongoing impacts of intergenerational trauma, gaps in perinatal supports, and culturally unsafe health care interactions. Discussion: Perinatal wellbeing in this nêhiyaw community is influenced by interconnected family, cultural, and structural systems. The RSHFS model reflected participants' lived experiences and identified pathways to restoring family relationships, strengthening cultural identity, supporting healing, providing additional perinatal supports and system navigation, and addressing cultural safety.

Indexed as

Indigenous CanadiansPerinatal CareAdultAlbertaFamily SupportFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesAlbertacommunity-based participatory researchFirst NationsIndigenousmaternal healthqualitative researchsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42445921
PMCPMC13357864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.