ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Removing registration holds reduced alcohol prevention program completion without improving college student retention.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Several online alcohol prevention programs have been developed to reduce alcohol use and risky drinking behaviors among university students in the United States (U.S.). Many large universities have adopted these programs due to their high fidelity and low staff burden, though little research to date has investigated the implementation of these programs. Method: The current study leveraged a program implementation change at a large public university to investigate the effect of registration holds on program completion rates and student retention rates at the university. Registration holds were used to prevent students from continuing their enrollment at the university if they did not complete the required online alcohol prevention program within their first term of enrollment. The university stopped using registration holds to enforce program completion after concerns were raised that they were inhibiting student retention at the university. Results: This program evaluation indicated that when the university stopped using registration holds to promote completion of an online alcohol prevention program, program completion rates decreased from 87.9-98.6% in prior years to 81.2%, while student retention at the university did not change. An analysis of historical program data demonstrated that students who engaged in frequent alcohol use, students over the age of 18, male students, and Black and American Indian or Alaskan Native students were less likely to complete an optional follow-up program component. Discussion: Findings suggest that registration holds improved program completion rates and were not associated with decreased university student retention rates. Lower program completion rates may result in some students benefiting from prevention programming while others are left behind. College administrators and alcohol researchers working with college populations may use these findings to guide implementation decisions and spur future research about factors that influence the implementation of online alcohol prevention programs at colleges and universities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.