ArticleJournal of the West African College of Surgeons
Audit of Tracheostomy Decannulation in a Suburban Tertiary Care Hospital.
Article in Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tracheostomy decannulation is the process of re-establishment of normal naso tracheal ventilation in a patient undergoing tracheostomy. Success rates for decannulation show wide variations. This study audited the outcome of tracheostomy decannulation in an African cohort managed in a tertiary healthcare facility. Materials and Methods: The charts and records of patients who underwent tracheostomy decannulation in a 10-year period were retrieved. The primary outcome measure was successful decannulation. The relationship between successful decannulation and patients' sociodemographic variables, pre tracheostomy endotracheal intubation, duration of intubation, duration of tracheostomy, and indications for tracheostomy was determined using inferential statistics. Results: A total of 38 patients were admitted for decannulation during the period. Bypass of upper airway obstruction was the commonest indication for tracheostomy (60.5%), followed by mechanical ventilation (34.2%). Only 20 (52.6%) patients were successfully decannulated at the first attempt. An additional six patients were decannulated after various secondary procedures, giving an overall successful decannulation rate of 68.42%. Preoperative endotracheal intubation and duration of endotracheal intubation were significant predictors of failed decannulation. Conclusion: We conclude that primary decannulation is successful in about half of the patients adjudged qualified for such in our practice; this increases to 68.4% with the secondary procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.