Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445711›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2026

Comparative analysis of LDR and HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer: the critical role of overall treatment time - a decade of experience.

Purnima Thakur, Kaalindi Singh, Vineet Lakhanpal, Manish Gupta, Lalit C Kant, Parul Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Purnima ThakurDepartment of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-934X
Kaalindi SinghDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Vineet LakhanpalDepartment of Community Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Manish GuptaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Lalit C KantDepartment of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Parul SharmaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study compares low dose rate (LDR) and high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in the treatment of cervical cancer treated at a tertiary care cancer centre in North India. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 316 cervical cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2019 was conducted. Outcomes of 240 patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by HDR were compared with 76 patients treated with a historical group of LDR brachytherapy. Results: The median follow-up was 60 months and 34.4 months for LDR and HDR groups, respectively. Overall treatment time (OTT) was longer in the HDR group and pelvic lymph node positivity was also higher. HDR brachytherapy showed a higher adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for 5-year OS [HR = 2.3, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-3.3] and local recurrence (HR = 1.5, p = 0.018, 95% CI: 1.07-2.18) compared to LDR. HDR showed higher adjusted HR for 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.8, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.3-2.6). The 5-year OS was 53% in the LDR group and the median survival was not reached, whereas in the HDR group, 5-year OS was 23% with median survival of 34 months. Rectal toxicity was higher in the LDR group. Conclusions: HDR brachytherapy offers clear logistical and patient convenience advantages compared to LDR; however, this benefit comes with the trade-off of higher risks of mortality and relapse when treatment duration is prolonged. Optimizing HDR - through strategies such as reducing OTT and incorporating image guidance - can help mitigate these risks and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

brachytherapycancer cervixhigh dose ratelow dose ratesurvivaltoxicity

Identifiers

PMID42445711
PMCPMC13364224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.