ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2026
Comparative analysis of LDR and HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer: the critical role of overall treatment time - a decade of experience.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study compares low dose rate (LDR) and high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in the treatment of cervical cancer treated at a tertiary care cancer centre in North India. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 316 cervical cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2019 was conducted. Outcomes of 240 patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by HDR were compared with 76 patients treated with a historical group of LDR brachytherapy. Results: The median follow-up was 60 months and 34.4 months for LDR and HDR groups, respectively. Overall treatment time (OTT) was longer in the HDR group and pelvic lymph node positivity was also higher. HDR brachytherapy showed a higher adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for 5-year OS [HR = 2.3, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-3.3] and local recurrence (HR = 1.5, p = 0.018, 95% CI: 1.07-2.18) compared to LDR. HDR showed higher adjusted HR for 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.8, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.3-2.6). The 5-year OS was 53% in the LDR group and the median survival was not reached, whereas in the HDR group, 5-year OS was 23% with median survival of 34 months. Rectal toxicity was higher in the LDR group. Conclusions: HDR brachytherapy offers clear logistical and patient convenience advantages compared to LDR; however, this benefit comes with the trade-off of higher risks of mortality and relapse when treatment duration is prolonged. Optimizing HDR - through strategies such as reducing OTT and incorporating image guidance - can help mitigate these risks and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.