ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026
Harmonization of slice thickness through resampling improves comparability of MRI-derived neonatal brain volumes.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess reliability and agreement of brain volume measurements from neonatal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired with different slice thickness settings (i.e., 2 mm, 3 mm and 3 mm resampled). Methods: We used term-equivalent (38-45 weeks postmenstrual age) T2-weighted MRI scans with slice thicknesses of 2 mm and 3 mm from a subset of 40 preterm and term infants (27-40 weeks' gestation) from two existing neonatal imaging cohorts. Resampling of the 2 mm scans to a 3 mm grid provided a third set of scans, referred to as "3 mm resampled". Automated brain segmentation provided intracranial volume, total brain volume, and volumes for eight brain structures. Reliability and agreement of volume measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots, respectively. Results: For all volumes, inter-scan reliability was higher for 3 mm vs. 3 mm resampled scans (mean observer ICC >0.92) compared to 2 mm vs. 3 mm scans (mean observer ICC >0.87). Bland-Altman plots revealed smaller mean volume differences between 3 mm and 3 mm resampled scans than between 2 mm and 3 mm scans. However, a proportional bias was found for deep gray matter volume for 3 mm vs. 3 mm resampled scans. Conclusion: Slice thickness influences brain volume measurements from neonatal MRI. Harmonization of imaging data acquired with different settings through image resampling improves reliability and agreement of brain volume measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.