ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Divergent allometric strategies and biomass allocation patterns of four key tree taxa in subtropical China.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate forest biomass estimation must simultaneously satisfy the statistical additivity of components and resolve the resource-allocation trade-offs that unfold during tree ontogeny, yet conventional models often fail on both counts and overlook bark as a distinct functional component. Methods: Using destructive-sampling data from 498 trees of Results: Incorporating D²H improved the stem-wood fit, and the additive system explained 93.6-98.4% of the variance in total aboveground biomass. Allometric trajectories revealed divergent strategies. Discussion: Because hardwood bark scales near-isometrically rather than as a constant fraction, ignoring its allometry systematically underestimates carbon stocks in mature broadleaved forests. The resulting taxon- and component-specific equation system provides a directly applicable tool for reducing systematic bias in regional carbon assessment, indicating that carbon accounting should move beyond a purely volumetric perspective toward a component-resolved framework that incorporates life-history allocation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.