Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445676›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Divergent allometric strategies and biomass allocation patterns of four key tree taxa in subtropical China.

Jia Yang, Wencheng Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jia YangHainan Academy of Forestry (Hainan Academy of Mangroves), Haikou, China.
Wencheng PengHainan Academy of Forestry (Hainan Academy of Mangroves), Haikou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate forest biomass estimation must simultaneously satisfy the statistical additivity of components and resolve the resource-allocation trade-offs that unfold during tree ontogeny, yet conventional models often fail on both counts and overlook bark as a distinct functional component. Methods: Using destructive-sampling data from 498 trees of Results: Incorporating D²H improved the stem-wood fit, and the additive system explained 93.6-98.4% of the variance in total aboveground biomass. Allometric trajectories revealed divergent strategies. Discussion: Because hardwood bark scales near-isometrically rather than as a constant fraction, ignoring its allometry systematically underestimates carbon stocks in mature broadleaved forests. The resulting taxon- and component-specific equation system provides a directly applicable tool for reducing systematic bias in regional carbon assessment, indicating that carbon accounting should move beyond a purely volumetric perspective toward a component-resolved framework that incorporates life-history allocation strategies.

Indexed as

allometric scalingbark defensebiomass additivitylife-history strategyresource allocationsubtropical forests

Identifiers

PMID42445676
PMCPMC13357904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.