ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
A Standardized Classification of Uveal Injury.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Standardized Classification of Uveal Injury.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Mechanical ocular injury involving the uvea poses significant surgical challenges and risks of irreversible visual impairment. Currently, there is no standardized classification to guide the management and prognosis of uveal injuries. This study aims to establish such a classification system. Methods: A methodological proposal for a novel classification was developed based on the most posterior location of uveal laceration/rupture and the extent of quadrant involvement. The classification was informed by clinical data with uveal injury. The system is designed to be determinable during clinical examination, emergency repair, or vitrectomy. Results: This study proposes a novel, standardized classification system for uveal injury based on the most posterior location of uveal laceration or rupture: Zone I (iris), Zone II (ciliary body), Zone III (choroid anterior to the equator), and Zone IV (choroid posterior to the equator), each subdivided (a-d) by extent of quadrant involvement. The system defines reproducible surgical approaches per zone. Conclusion: This novel classification is presented as a proposal to standardize the assessment of uveal injury, addressing a critical gap in existing ocular trauma systems. It provides a structured framework to guide surgical decision-making and anatomical restoration and to facilitate future research in the management of severe ocular trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.