ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2026
Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of
Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was designed to achieve more effective treatment for patients and to encourage the development of new antibiotics, specifically targeting multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. This bacterium is one of the primary causative agents of hospital-acquired infections (HAI). It is classified as a critical priority pathogen for the development of new antibiotics according to the World Health Organization (2024). In this study, 76 isolates from four bacterial genera were analyzed. E. coli was identified as the most prevalent infectious agent with 52% of the isolates, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (16%). Internal Medicine was the hospital department with the highest frequency of E. coli infections. Sixty-five percent of the samples were derived from urine. This bacterium was more prevalent in females (57.5%) than in males (42.5%). The highest resistance rates were observed for Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin, with 90% and 77.5% respectively, while the lowest resistance was found for the Carbapenems Ertapenem, Meropenem, and Aminoglycoside Amikacin, with 22.5%. Twenty-two point five percent of the E. coli isolates were classified as resistant, and 77.5% as multidrug-resistant. Sixty-two point five percent were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers. All of these isolates resisted Ampicillin, while 4% were resistant to Ertapenem, Meropenem, and Amikacin. E. coli was identified as the primary causative pathogen of HAI in the Hospital under study and demonstrated resistance to most currently prescribed antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.