ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2026
Assessing Compliance with Hand Hygiene Practices in Healthcare Settings in Benin: a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hand hygiene is a cornerstone of preventing healthcare-associated infections, particularly in maternity and neonatology. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Benin healthcare professionals regarding hygiene deficiencies that contribute to maternal and neonatal infections via a data collection survey. Methods: Hand hygiene knowledge was evaluated among healthcare professionals from six healthcare centers between August and September, 2023, using the WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework (HHSAF). Hand hygiene compliance was assessed by observing 30 trained IPC professionals across the hospitals during the five WHO moments. Results: A total of 159 health care professionals were included in the study. Most healthcare workers demonstrated good awareness of the appropriate moments for hand hygiene, with a minimum knowledge rate of 65%. Hand hygiene compliance rates exceeded 50% across the surveyed facilities. Compliance rates varied notably by profession, with doctors showing the highest adherence, particularly in hand hygiene before patient contact (100%), followed by nurses (92.30%). Male professionals generally adhered to hand hygiene practices more than their female counterparts, with the highest male compliance at CHUD B/A (100%) and the lowest at HZ-Tanguieta (35%). However, no statistically significant differences in hand hygiene or glove-wearing compliance were observed across gender, department, or professional qualification (p > 0.05). Conclusions: These findings provide valuable insights into current hygiene practices among healthcare professionals, highlighting areas requiring improvement to effectively reduce maternal and neonatal infections. The results will inform targeted training programs to enhance compliance and ultimately improve health outcomes for mothers and newborns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.