ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Understanding death wishes in later life: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Death wishes and end-of-life legislation are increasingly relevant in ageing societies, where demographic shifts and evolving legal frameworks appear to raise complex ethical and clinical challenges. Summary: Wishes to die among older adults are complex and not limited to mental illness or terminal illness. Although depression and demoralization are common, evidence suggests that many older individuals experience these wishes in the absence of psychiatric disorders. These experiences often reflect an existential response to cumulative losses in autonomy, identity, and social embeddedness. This review organizes existing literature using a multilevel explanatory framework. At the psychological-existential and identity level, death wishes are associated with depression, demoralization, loss of meaning, and narrative disruption. At the social-relational level, loneliness, perceived burdensomeness, and social disconnection play a central role. At the structural-cultural level, ageism, societal narratives of dependency, and broader cultural meanings of ageing contribute to the emergence and interpretation of death wishes. At the legal-ethical level, medical assistance in dying (MAiD) frameworks shape how autonomy, suffering, and legitimacy of death wishes are understood in different jurisdictions. Across these levels, death wishes appear to arise from interacting psychological, relational, and societal processes rather than from a single underlying cause. Qualitative studies further highlight the deeply personal nature of these experiences, often linked to feelings of being a burden, narrative closure, or perceived loss of future meaning. Clinically, evidence indicates that a purely psychiatric or autonomy-driven approach is insufficient. Instead, effective responses require narrative competence, existential sensitivity, and awareness of contextual influences. This review synthesizes these findings into an integrated conceptual framework and outlines key implications for clinical practice in geriatrics, psychiatry, and palliative care. Key message: This review argues for a multidimensional approach that recognizes death wishes not only as clinical or legal phenomena, but as deeply human expressions of suffering, identity, and relationality in the context of ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.