Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445538›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2026

Deep learning and body composition model for predicting postoperative complications in colorectal cancer.

Ding Ding, Ran Xuan, Rui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ding DingDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Hefei), Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ran XuanDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Hefei), Hefei, Anhui, China.
Rui LiDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Hefei), Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for CRC; however, postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage, infections, and thromboembolic events, continue to substantially affect patient prognosis. These complications are associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased healthcare expenditures, delayed postoperative recovery, and elevated mortality risk. Therefore, the accurate identification of patients at high risk for postoperative complications is of considerable clinical importance for optimizing perioperative management and improving surgical outcomes. Methods: A total of 154 patients were retrospectively enrolled, including 99 patients in the training cohort and 55 patients in the external validation cohort. Abdominal CT images at the L1-L5 levels were automatically segmented using a pretrained DeepLabv3-ResNet101 model implemented on the Onekey platform, followed by manual correction to ensure segmentation accuracy. Visceral adipose tissue, subcutaneous adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and intramuscular adipose tissue were segmented, and body composition indices (VAT_h, SAT_h, SMA_h, and IMAT_h) were subsequently calculated after normalization by patient height. Deep learning features were extracted from CT images using a pretrained 3D ResNet-18 model. Feature selection and model development were conducted independently. Random forest, logistic regression, and extremely randomized trees combined with recursive feature elimination were applied for feature selection. Subsequently, logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms were constructed and compared for predictive performance. Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses identified BMI, SMA_h, SAT_h, and VAT_h as independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Among all predictive models, the combined model incorporating the deep learning score (DL-score) achieved the best performance, with AUC values of 0.944 and 0.855 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. DeLong test results further demonstrated that both the deep learning model and the combined model significantly outperformed the clinical and body composition models, whereas the combined model provided superior discrimination in identifying high-risk patients.

Indexed as

automatic segmentationbody compositioncolorectal cancerdeep learningmachine learningpostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID42445538
PMCPMC13357902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.