Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445506›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026

Acute caffeine supplementation and cycling time-trial performance across different task durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhenyu Wang, Jingwen Zhang, Changmo Cho

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenyu Wang *Department of Physical Education, Graduate School, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jingwen Zhang *Department of Physical Education, Graduate School, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Changmo ChoDepartment of Kinesiology, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/objectives: Acute caffeine (CAF) ingestion may enhance cycling time-trial (TT) performance, but its ergogenic effects may be expressed differently across TT tasks with markedly different durations. Utilizing the power-duration relationship and critical power framework, this systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of acute pre-exercise CAF ingestion on cycling TT performance and compared effect estimates between prespecified short-duration (≤10 min) and long-duration (≥20 min) TT tasks. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD420261334904), five databases were searched from inception to 14 January 2026 for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in healthy cyclists. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences (SMDs; Hedges' Results: Twenty-three trials were included. CAF reduced TT completion time (SMD = -0.32, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.16; Conclusions: The findings of the present study indicate that acute pre-exercise caffeine ingestion can provide a small but practically meaningful benefit for cycling TT performance, primarily reflected in reduced completion time across the included prespecified short-duration (≤10 min) and long-duration (≥20 min) TT tasks. The increase in mean power output was mainly evident in short-duration TT tasks, suggesting that improved average mechanical power output may play an important role in short-duration performance gains, whereas improvements in long-duration TT tasks may involve additional performance-related factors beyond mean power output. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261334904, identifier CRD420261334904.

Indexed as

caffeinecycling performanceergogenic aidmeta-analysistime trial

Identifiers

PMID42445506
PMCPMC13357162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.