Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445476›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026

Clinical and Pathogenic Characteristics of 45 Cases of Bloodstream Infection in Obstetrics: A Clinical Analysis.

Jing Xie, Ling Zhu, Ting Wu, Guanglin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing XieDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, 423000, People's Republic of China.
Ling ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, 423000, People's Republic of China.
Ting WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, 423000, People's Republic of China.
Guanglin LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, 423000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinical characteristics, pathogenic profile, and outcomes of pregnant and puerperal women bloodstream infections. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 45 pregnant women with positive blood cultures admitted to the First People's Hospital of Chenzhou from January 2018 to March 2025. Results: The positive rate of blood culture is 1.64‰. According to whether the bacteria are multi-drug resistant, they are divided into non multi-drug resistant group (25 cases) and multi drug resistant group (20 cases). There were statistically significant differences included vaginal delivery numbers ( Conclusion: In the event of bloodstream infection, there is a high possibility of infection with non-multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients with obvious cough/sputum symptoms, failed vaginal delivery to cesarean section, placental abnormalities, and artificial placental abruption; Patients with a history of ectopic pregnancy or who have undergone uterine surgery other than cesarean section during this pregnancy are more likely to be infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Notably, when infection and shock coexist, the cause of shock may not necessarily be infectious.

Indexed as

blood culturebloodstream infection bacteremiapregnant and puerperal womensepsis

Identifiers

PMID42445476
PMCPMC13361280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.