Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445469›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Development of the glioma imaging complexity score (GICS): a volumetric MRI-based stratification framework.

Alex Ofori, Guozhu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex OforiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Guozhu SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quantitative MRI analysis and radiomics-based imaging assessment have increasingly contributed to neuro-oncological research by improving reproducibility and minimizing dependence on subjective radiological interpretation. Despite advancements in imaging analysis and visualization support technologies, standardized quantitative frameworks for classifying glioma MRI-derived complexity remain limited. Objective: To establish a quantitative framework based on MRI data for stratifying the complexity of glioma imaging. This framework utilizes standardized imaging features derived from segmentation, obtained through the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) initiative. Methods: A retrospective quantitative MRI analysis was performed using segmentation datasets from 1,251 glioma cases obtained from the publicly available BraTS repository. Quantitative imaging variables, including total tumor volume, enhancing tumor volume, edema volume, necrotic/non-enhancing core volume, and maximum tumor diameter, were extracted using voxel-based segmentation methods. Cases were ranked according to total tumor volume and subsequently categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-complexity groups corresponding to GICS-1, GICS-2, and GICS-3 classifications. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis testing, and Pearson/Spearman correlation analysis. Results: Tertile stratification produced three evenly distributed groups, each comprising 417 cases. The mean total tumor volume increased across GICS categories, from 35.40 ± 15.84 cm Conclusion: The GICS framework represents a preliminary quantitative MRI stratification model constructed using standardized segmentation datasets. The results indicate that segmentation-derived MRI variables can be organized into reproducible stratification groups, thereby laying the groundwork for prospective studies on imaging-based complexity assessment and exploratory visualization-support approaches in glioma surgery.

Indexed as

BRATSGICSgliomaimaging complexityMRIneuronavigationquantitative imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID42445469
PMCPMC13358191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.