ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Cervical Cancer Based on
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Transcriptomic data were obtained from GEO and TCGA databases. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from GSE63514 (24 normal controls, 28 CESE samples) and GSE158814 (2 negative controls, 2 CT-infection HeLa cells). Overlapping genes were defined as CT-related genes. TCGA-CESC cohort (n = 252) was split into training and validation sets. Univariate Cox regression was used to screen candidate genes, and then multivariate Cox regression were performed to construct a prognostic signature and calculate RiskScore. LASSO-Cox regression and bootstrap analysis evaluated model stability. Patients were stratified by median RiskScore. A nomogram integrating clinical factors and RiskScore was established, followed by evaluation using calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic, and decision curve analyses. Gene set enrichment analysis, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the biological and therapeutic implications of the high- and low- RiskScore group. Results: A total of 31 CT-related CESC genes were identified, among which Conclusion: We established a novel prognostic model for CESC based on CT-related genes in an HPV-positive CESC background, which provides new insights into CT infection-associated immune regulation in CESC and individualized immunotherapy and targeted treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.