ArticleTransgender health2026
Clinician Perspectives on Gender-Affirming Medical Care of Nonbinary Youth.
Article in Transgender health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions, challenges, and opportunities in providing care to nonbinary youth from the clinician perspective. Methods: This was a qualitative study investigating views of pediatric and adult primary care and subspecialty clinicians who provide gender-affirming medical care to nonbinary adolescents. Purposeful sampling was used to select and interview clinicians from across the United States from July to November 2022. Data were analyzed using a grounded theoretical approach. Major categories were chosen by consensus from the research team, and a conceptual model regarding the provision of gender-affirming medical care to nonbinary youth was developed. Results: Sixteen clinicians were interviewed to reach saturation. Five main categories were developed: clinical approach, clinician resources, clinician characteristics, nonbinary youth supported in their decision-making and treatment, and society-level factors. An overarching category was acknowledgment and acceptance of gender as nonbinary. The conceptual model incorporates these categories and demonstrates the importance of an embodiment-goal approach in the care of nonbinary adolescent patients. Conclusion: Recognition and acceptance of nonbinary genders are critical in the provision of gender-affirming medical care to nonbinary youth from the clinician perspective. Use of an embodiment-goal approach-goals that focus on how an individual wishes to embody their gender-may facilitate gender-affirming care of nonbinary adolescents delivered by clinicians. Future prospective research studies acknowledging and testing treatment approaches and best practices for nonbinary persons should be incorporated into future standards of care and clinical practice guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.