Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445313›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2026

Constructing Genetic Risk Scores: Robust Bayesian Approach through Projected Summary Statistics and Flexible Shrinkage.

Yuzheng Dun, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Jin Jin, Akihiko Nishimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuzheng DunDepartment of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University.
Nilanjan ChatterjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University.
Jin JinDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania.
Akihiko NishimuraDepartment of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University.

Funding

Robust Methods for Polygenic Analysis to Inform Disease Etiology and Enhance Risk PredictionR01HG010480 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHATTERJEE, NILANJAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
Multifactoral breast cancer risk prediction accounting for ethnic and tumor diversityU01CA249866 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHATTERJEE, NILANJAN · 2020 to 2023
$2.3M
Towards precision risk stratification, diagnosis, and treatment: statistical and computational machinery for synthesizing information across massive, diverse sources of genomic and clinical dataR35GM160458 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Akihiko Nishimura · 2025 to 2026
$854k
Statistical methods and tools for enhancing polygenic risk prediction and discovery of causal gene pathwaysR35GM157133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jin Jin · 2025 to 2026
$813k
Multi-ethnic risk prediction for complex human diseases integrating multi-source genetic and non-genetic informationR00HG012223 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JIN, JIN · 2023 to 2025
$727k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA249866NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG012223NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010480NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM157133NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM160458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) developed from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can be used for risk stratification by quantifying the genetic contribution to disease, and many clinical applications have been proposed. Bayesian methods are popular for building PRS because of their natural ability to regularize models and incorporate external information. In this article, we present new theoretical results, methods, and extensive numerical studies to advance Bayesian methods for PRS applications. We identify a potential risk, under a common Bayesian PRS framework, of posterior impropriety when integrating the required GWAS summary statistics and linkage disequilibrium (LD) data from distinct sources. As a principled remedy, we propose a projection of the summary statistics that ensures compatibility between the two sources and in turn a proper behavior of the posterior. We further introduce a new PRS method, with accompanying software, under the less-explored Bayesian bridge prior to more flexibly model varying sparsity levels in effect-size distributions. We extensively benchmark it against alternative Bayesian methods using synthetic and real datasets, quantifying the impact of prior specification and LD estimation strategy. Our proposed PRS-Bridge, equipped with the projection technique and flexible prior, demonstrates the most consistent and generally superior performance across a variety of scenarios.

Indexed as

conjugate gradient samplerhigh-dimensional regressionpolygenic scoreshrinkage priorstatistical genetics

Identifiers

PMID42445313
PMCPMC13364144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.