ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2026
Plasma proteomics based on machine learning predict the early risk of kidney outcomes in patients with DKD: a prospective cohort study from UK Biobank.
Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the predominant cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide. Early identification of patients at heightened risk for adverse kidney outcomes remains a critical unmet clinical need. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 918 DKD participants from the UK Biobank. Baseline plasma proteomic profiling quantified 1,463 proteins using Olink proximity extension assays. Three nested Cox proportional hazards models with incremental covariate adjustment identified proteins associated with composite kidney outcomes. To prevent information leakage, all feature selection, hyperparameter optimization, and model development were performed exclusively within the training cohort (70% random split) via a multi-stage pipeline integrating LASSO-Cox regression, Random Survival Forest, Boruta algorithm, and Sequential Forward Selection. XGBoost Cox modeling with SHAP interpretability analysis quantified variable contributions. Predictive performance was validated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, 15-year longitudinal trajectory modeling, ROC benchmarking, 10-fold nested cross-validation, and sensitivity analyses restricted to KDIGO-defined DKD. An interactive web application was developed for clinical translation. Results: Of 1,463 proteins examined, 633 demonstrated significant associations with kidney outcomes across all three Cox models. Functional enrichment highlighted immune-inflammatory pathways, PI3K-Akt signaling, and chemokine cascades as central to DKD progression. The machine learning framework identified an 11-protein signature, which was refined to 10 core biomarkers (HLA-E, EFNA1, GPR158, FSTL3, ART3, GM2A, CLEC1A, CKAP4, IFNGR1, EPHA2) following survival and longitudinal trajectory validation. The protein-only model achieved robust discrimination (AUC = 0.808 [95% CI 0.767-0.848] for composite outcomes; AUC = 0.807 [95% CI 0.765-0.848] for renal death), comparable to fully integrated models incorporating demographics and metabolic variables. Systematic benchmarking across 101 algorithm combinations identified LASSO-RSF as optimal (C-index = 0.94 in training; 0.73 in independent testing), with reliable calibration through mid-term follow-up (Integrated Calibration Index = 0.019-0.022). The web-based tool enables real-time, personalized risk stratification. Conclusions: This study establishes a validated 10-protein signature for early prediction of kidney outcomes in DKD. The systematic machine learning framework and deployable web application provide accessible, interpretable risk assessment to support precision nephrology and preemptive clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.