ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Student perceptions of artificial intelligence in higher education: a structural analysis at an Italian university.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming higher education, yet understanding of student perceptions remains limited. This study investigates the structure of student attitudes toward AI and identifies key predictors among Italian university students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 864 students at the University of Palermo (May-June 2025). The questionnaire examined demographics, AI experience, and attitudes using 10 Likert-type items. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: Most students (65.8%) reported superficial AI knowledge, yet 93.6% had used AI applications, predominantly ChatGPT (59.8%). Factor analyses identified two distinct latent constructs: perceived Impact of AI and AI-related Concerns, negatively correlated ( Conclusions: Student attitudes toward AI reflect two distinct dimensions: opportunity recognition and risk awareness, systematically influenced by gender, discipline, and AI experience. Successful implementation requires tailored approaches addressing gender-specific concerns, discipline-specific needs, and promoting direct AI experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.