ArticleERJ open research2026
"Good health" and care needs in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis/progressive pulmonary fibrosis: the COCOS-IPF patient-led European focus groups.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other progressive forms of pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) place a heavy burden on patients' lives. While research on clinical aspects of IPF and PPF progresses, evidence on patients' subjective experiences is still emerging. This qualitative study investigated how patients with IPF/PPF and caregivers define "good health", key health outcomes of the care they receive and unmet care needs. This work is part of the COCOS-IPF project, which aims to develop a Core Outcome Set for IPF and PPF. Methods: Together with the European Lung Foundation and the European Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation, focus groups were conducted by trained patient representatives, supported by allied health professionals, across five European countries. Discussions followed a semi-structured topic guide. An inductive thematic analysis was performed, following Braun and Clarke's framework for extraction of qualitative data, with findings refined through consensus meetings. Results: Our analyses revealed 10 major themes reflecting participants' perspectives on health, reflecting four broader areas: social connectedness, adaptive strategies and activity, physical and emotional wellbeing, and overarching perceptions of quality of life and normality. One additional major theme summarises participants' unfulfilled care needs, including access to clear information, holistic and person-centred care, and attention to psychological and social needs. Conclusion: Patients and caregivers define good health in a multidimensional way, linking physical, emotional and social aspects. Including these perspectives in developing the IPF/PPF Core Outcome Set could better align care with patients' real-life needs and priorities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.