ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Automated cytotoxicity assessment of natural killer cells by flow cytometry.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cell-based therapies are emerging as highly promising candidates for cancer treatment, but their development and quality control depend on robust assessment of key critical quality attributes, particularly their cytotoxicity. Despite the availability of various approaches for assessing cytotoxicity, existing techniques often suffer from high data variability and show limited reproducibility. We compared commonly used approaches for NK-cell cytotoxicity assessment, including calcein release, lactate dehydrogenase release, and flow cytometry (FCM)-based analysis, using NK-92 effector and GFP-labelled K562 target cells. Our results provide insight into the shortcomings of these methods, as well as problems resulting from unharmonized evaluation criteria and limitations of endpoint measurements, which are commonly applied in literature. We selected FCM as the most suitable platform for standardized evaluation and developed an automated gating workflow for cytotoxicity analysis. The automated workflow was benchmarked against three independent manual evaluations to assess agreement, bias, and performance. The optimized workflow showed agreement with manual analysis while remaining essentially unbiased. In addition, automated analysis reduced evaluator dependence by producing deterministic outputs from identical input data. Further comparison revealed directional bias in manual gating, indicating that a relevant portion of measurement variability arose from manual evaluation, rather than biology alone. We present autogating as a fit-for-purpose, automated FCM-based strategy for NK-cell cytotoxicity evaluation that preserves agreement with manual analysis while improving standardization and reproducibility, thereby providing a practical route toward more harmonized cytotoxicity testing in cell therapy workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.