Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445204›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Automated cytotoxicity assessment of natural killer cells by flow cytometry.

Aleksander Szarzynski, Valentin von Werz, Gregor Mattert, Werner Dammermann, Oliver Spadiut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleksander SzarzynskiResearch Area Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Valentin von WerzResearch Area Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor MattertCenter for Translational Medicine Germany, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Werner DammermannCenter for Translational Medicine Germany, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Oliver SpadiutResearch Area Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cell-based therapies are emerging as highly promising candidates for cancer treatment, but their development and quality control depend on robust assessment of key critical quality attributes, particularly their cytotoxicity. Despite the availability of various approaches for assessing cytotoxicity, existing techniques often suffer from high data variability and show limited reproducibility. We compared commonly used approaches for NK-cell cytotoxicity assessment, including calcein release, lactate dehydrogenase release, and flow cytometry (FCM)-based analysis, using NK-92 effector and GFP-labelled K562 target cells. Our results provide insight into the shortcomings of these methods, as well as problems resulting from unharmonized evaluation criteria and limitations of endpoint measurements, which are commonly applied in literature. We selected FCM as the most suitable platform for standardized evaluation and developed an automated gating workflow for cytotoxicity analysis. The automated workflow was benchmarked against three independent manual evaluations to assess agreement, bias, and performance. The optimized workflow showed agreement with manual analysis while remaining essentially unbiased. In addition, automated analysis reduced evaluator dependence by producing deterministic outputs from identical input data. Further comparison revealed directional bias in manual gating, indicating that a relevant portion of measurement variability arose from manual evaluation, rather than biology alone. We present autogating as a fit-for-purpose, automated FCM-based strategy for NK-cell cytotoxicity evaluation that preserves agreement with manual analysis while improving standardization and reproducibility, thereby providing a practical route toward more harmonized cytotoxicity testing in cell therapy workflows.

Indexed as

Cytotoxicity, ImmunologicCytotoxicity Tests, ImmunologicFlow CytometryKiller Cells, NaturalHumansK562 CellsReproducibility of Resultsautomatizationcytotoxicityflow cytometrygating strategyNK-92 cell lineNK cells

Identifiers

PMID42445204
PMCPMC13357856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.