Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445163›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Advancing equity in applied health and care research training: a reflexive perspective on the NIHR INSIGHT programme.

Nagina Khan, Nina Stewart, Kish Bhatti-Sinclair, Stephen Peckham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nagina KhanCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Nina StewartSchool of Education, Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Kish Bhatti-SinclairDepartment of Childhood, Social Work and Social Care, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.
Stephen PeckhamCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health inequities in the United Kingdom disproportionately affect racialised, globally marginalized, and working-class communities. Research training programmes shape who becomes a researcher, which questions are prioritized and which knowledge is recognized as legitimate. This Perspective provides a reflexive, practice-informed account of the NIHR Inspiring Students into Research Training (INSIGHT) Programme across three South East England institutions: the University of Kent (MSc Applied Health and Care Research), the University of Brighton (MRes), and the University of Chichester (MRes). Drawing on programme documentation, early evaluation insights, teaching experiences and reflections from programme leaders, learners, and partner organizations, the paper examines how equity-oriented pedagogies have been embedded in postgraduate research training. Illustrative reflections from learners and informal contributors, drawn from module feedback, demonstrate the programme's collaborative ethos. The curriculum integrates structural competence, cultural humility, epistemic justice and co-produced patient and public involvement (PPI) alongside core research methods. Findings suggest that embedding equity-focused, socially accountable approaches enhances learner engagement, supports epistemic inclusion, and strengthens the relevance of research for underserved communities. The programme also highlights structural tensions between workforce composition and eligibility criteria: many internationally trained and minoritised practitioners in the NHS and social care, often recruited to address workforce shortages, may be excluded from funded training due to residency, fee-status, or professional timelines. This Perspective argues that reflexive, practice-informed curriculum design, together with more flexible and inclusive eligibility policies, can contribute to a diverse, socially accountable applied health and care research workforce.

Indexed as

applied health research trainingcritical pedagogydecolonising pedagogyequity-oriented educationinclusive curriculumpatient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE)social accountabilitystructural competence

Identifiers

PMID42445163
PMCPMC13362297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.