ReviewThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2026
Metallosis in Spine: A Review of 2020-2025 Case Reports.
Review in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metallosis is a rare but serious post-surgical complication of metal implantation where metal corrodes and debris accumulates in periprosthetic tissue. The mechanism, effects, diagnosis, and risk factors that contribute to metallosis in spine surgery remain poorly understood. Given its rarity, much of what we know about metallosis in spinal surgery is translated from joint arthroplasty literature and derived from case reports. The purpose of this paper is to review recent case reports of metallosis in patients having previously undergone instrumented spinal fusion, with particular emphasis on clinical presentations. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE for studies that containing the terms "spine, "spinal", "lumbar", or "cervical" and "metallosis", "corrosion" or "metal hypersensitivity", and "fusion", "fixation", "stabilization", "diskectomy" or "discectomy" from January 2020 to December 2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results: 17 articles were identified and 12 case reports were included in the final review. Conclusion: Metallosis following spinal instrumentation has unpredictable presentations, occurring over a wide range of time, recently observed between one month and 15 years post-operatively. Recently reported presentations included systemic signs including anorexia and hair loss, structural signs including pain and neurological deficits, and absence of symptoms, making it imperative that metallosis is considered in the differential for post-operative complaints. As more cases of metal-losis are reported on in the spinal implant patient population, contributing factors must be clarified. Future directions of study may include identifying biological markers for early risk stratification for metallosis and seeking less-invasive diagnostic methods. Surgeons should be aware of this potential complication in spinal implant surgery and consider this as a cause of varied symptoms in this patient population. Level of Evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42445122PMC13360164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.