ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2026
At-Home Shoulder Exercises or Supervised Physical Therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if the clinical outcomes of patients with adhesive capsulitis were influenced by the type of shoulder exercise regimen prescribed. Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative cohort, therapeutic outcomes study of patients with primary or secondary systemic adhesive capsulitis who were initially treated with either a doctor-directed home-based exercise program (HEP) or the HEP supplemented with supervised physical therapy (SPT). Study participants were treated by one of two orthopaedists at a single institution between 2012 and 2022. Demographic and disease-specific data extracted from electronic medical records during the period of observation were compiled in an electronic database. Primary outcomes included shoulder range of motion (ROM) measures and treatment failures leading to operative intervention. Data were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann-Whitney U exact test. Results: There were 124 patients who met eligibility criteria, 81 in the HEP cohort and 43 in the SPT group. Intra-cohort comparisons showed significant increases in shoulder ROM in all planes between baseline and follow-up encounters (p<0.001), indicating clinical improvement with either shoulder rehabilitation method. However, inter-cohort comparisons demonstrated shoulder flexion and abduction were significantly greater in the HEP group than in the SPT group at both 8-week and final follow-up evaluations (p<0.001). While there were no treatment failures in the HEP cohort, 10 of 43 cases (23%) failed the SPT protocol, wherein an unconscious framing bias regarding treatment expectations and early operative intervention may have contributed to the high failure rate. Good clinical outcomes were obtained in all 10 cases with shoulder manipulation under anesthesia, arthroscopic global capsulotomy, and continued supervised physiotherapy. Conclusion: Patients with adhesive capsulitis should be treated initially with at-home shoulder stretching exercises, reserving more costly supervised physical therapy or operative intervention for recalcitrant cases. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42445119PMC13360622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.