ArticleGland surgery2026
Development and validation of a nomogram to assess recurrence risk in young patients with breast cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers.
Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative recurrence is a primary risk following breast cancer surgery. Compared to older patients, younger breast cancer patients typically experience a poorer prognosis. This study aimed to develop a predictive model based on preoperative serological markers-carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) and postoperative treatment modalities to evaluate the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in young breast cancer patients aged under 40 years. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 521 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at Fengxian District Central Hospital between June 2015 and April 2020. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 411 patients aged under 40 were ultimately included and divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Clinical characteristics were evaluated, including age, surgical procedure, tumor histological type, history of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), neural invasion (NI), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, molecular subtype, and preoperative serum tumor markers such as CA125 and CA153. Univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to select variables and develop a nomogram based on the training cohort. Survival analysis and plotting were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. The reliability of the nomogram was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Using the random grouping function in SPSS, the patients were divided into a training cohort (282/411) and a validation cohort (129/411) at a 7:3 ratio. The nomogram prediction model incorporated four risk factors: high expression of CA125 or CA153, receipt of radiotherapy, and LVI. In the training and validation cohorts, the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram for predicting 3-year RFS was 0.854 and 0.793, respectively, while the AUC for 5-year RFS was 0.85 and 0.801, respectively. Calibration curves demonstrated that the predicted probabilities of the model were in good agreement with the actual observations. Furthermore, DCA indicated that the nomogram model provided a superior net clinical benefit within the threshold probability range of 10-75%. Conclusions: We developed a survival prognostic model for young breast cancer patients based on preoperative serum tumor markers and postoperative treatment. The results confirmed that the combination of CA125 and CA153 is of great significance in predicting RFS in young women with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.