ArticleGland surgery2026
Integrating intratumoral and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics with clinicopathological features to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is invasive, and most radiomics models ignore peritumoral microenvironmental features. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in early breast cancer (EBC) based on preoperative ultrasound-derived intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features integrated with clinicopathological features. Methods: In this retrospective study, 327 patients with EBC were enrolled. Clinicopathological variables and preoperative ultrasound images were collected, and patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n=228) and a validation cohort (n=99) at a 7:3 ratio. Intratumoral, 4-mm peritumoral, and combined intratumoral-peritumoral regions of interest were delineated using ITK-SNAP software. Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine, and random forest machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to construct radiomics models based on intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined regions, respectively. A clinical-radiomics combined model was subsequently developed by integrating independent clinical predictors. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: Multivariable LR analysis identified maximal diameter and lymphovascular invasion as independent predictors of ALNM. Among the evaluated ML algorithms, the LR-based combined intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.868 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.795-0.933] in the validation cohort. Incorporation of independent clinical predictors further improved model performance, with the clinical-radiomics combined model yielding a validation AUC of 0.909 (95% CI: 0.851-0.960). Calibration curves and DCA indicated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes and demonstrated favorable clinical utility. SHAP analysis revealed that radiomics features contributed predominantly to model predictions. Conclusions: A predictive model integrating intratumoral and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics features with clinicopathological variables enables accurate preoperative identification of ALNM in patients with EBC. This model may serve as a reliable and non-invasive tool to guide individualized axillary management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.