Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445084›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2026

The application of double pedicled free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction following mastectomy in unilateral breast cancer.

Li Xie, Jiarui Song, Dongcai Lin, Xiaoqi Chen, Jidong Gao, Qiuxia Cui, Hong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li XieThe Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.
Jiarui SongDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Dongcai LinDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoqi ChenDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Jidong GaoDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Qiuxia CuiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Hong LiuThe Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to elucidate the technical points of double pedicled free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients with large and ptotic breast. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2022 to December 2023, of which 92 immediate breast reconstructions using DIEP flap were included in this study. There were 21 cases underwent double-pedicled DIEP and 71 cases underwent unilateral pedicled DIEP. Using the internal thoracic vessels were employed for vascular anastomosis, and in the double pedicled DIEP group, 21 flaps survived while in the unilateral group 70 cases survived. The satisfaction degree of the double pedicled group was higher than that of the unilateral-pedicled group. In the double pedicled group, there was 0 case with moderate to severe radiation dermatitis, compared to 12 cases in the unilateral group. The double pedicled DIEP group tended to explore obviously higher biopsy rate (47.6%) of unexpected discovery internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) than the unilateral pedicled group (16.9%). However, there was no significant difference (P=0.058) of the metastatic rate of IMLNs in the double pedicled group (50%) compared with that in the unilateral-pedicled group (25%). Clinically, for patients with large and sagging breasts, those requiring IMLN biopsy, those seeking to reduce side effects such as radiation-induced dermatitis, and those needing to ensure adequate blood supply to the flap, the double-tissue DIEP breast reconstruction surgery is an extremely effective autologous breast reconstruction method.

Indexed as

Breast cancerbreast reconstructiondeep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP)internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs)perforator flapvascular pedicle

Identifiers

PMID42445084
PMCPMC13358615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.