ArticleGland surgery2026
Validation of a protocol for pre-operative flap thickness assessment on dual-view digital mammography for the decision-making process in implant-based breast reconstruction.
Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pre-operative breast imaging is a critical component of the decision-making process for both oncological and reconstructive surgeons. The thickness of the non-glandular breast tissue coverage (BTC), including the skin and the subcutaneous fat layer overlying the anterior lamella of the Methods: We designed a retrospective, multi-reader study on a dataset of 40 unilateral DM cases obtained in the two standard views (CC and MLO). The study set was extracted from all consecutive cases recorded from January 2022 to March 2022 in two Breast Imaging Academic Centers involved in the project (the Breast Unit of the University of Naples Federico II and the Breast Unit of the University of Turin). The robustness of the proposed pre-operative assessments has been determined by deriving the metrics associated with the inter- and intra-observer agreement (P values of the matched measurements, measurement error, repeatability, limits of agreement, correlation) for each testing site and for their possible aggregations. Results: We found a highly satisfactory inter-observer agreement with good correlation among the four senior radiologists' measurements in all positions and on breasts of different density. The intra-observer agreement was also good: no significant differences and good correlation for either one. The method performed well also when used by less expert radiologists, satisfying the requirements for accuracy and repeatability set by the senior team. The analysis of the measured thickness consistently indicated a larger measurement error for the non-dense breast data than for the dense ones. Conclusions: The proposed approach seems to be well-standardized and reproducible, allowing good performance at different levels of experience. It is our hope that this methodological study will assist with preoperative surgical planning by providing a clinical validation tool to estimate mastectomy flap thickness and its impact on preoperative decision-making for optimizing surgical-reconstructive outcomes, both from the oncological and the aesthetic point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.