Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445078›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2026

Validation of a protocol for pre-operative flap thickness assessment on dual-view digital mammography for the decision-making process in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Pietro Maria Ferrando, Manuela Durando, Laura Bergamasco, Martina Caruso, Elisa Regini, Ciro Riccio, Elena Bozzo, Andrea Maria Rinaldo, Germana Bartoli, Donato Casella and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Pietro Maria Ferrando *Plastic Surgery Department, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio ospedaliero CTO, Torino, Italy.
Manuela Durando *Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Ospedaliero Molinette, Torino, Italy.
Laura BergamascoDepartment of Surgical Sciences. University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Ospedaliero Molinette, Torino, Italy.
Martina CarusoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Elisa ReginiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Ospedaliero Molinette, Torino, Italy.
Ciro RiccioDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Elena BozzoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Ospedaliero Molinette, Torino, Italy.
Andrea Maria RinaldoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Germana BartoliDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Ospedaliero Molinette, Torino, Italy.
Donato CasellaOncologic Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Giuseppe CatanutoHumanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy.
Eduardo GonzalezDepartment of Breast Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel LehrerDepartment of Breast Imaging, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martina PontilloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Maurizio Bruno NavaG.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Catania, Italy.
Alberto RancatiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Valeria Romeo *Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Nicola Rocco *Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pre-operative breast imaging is a critical component of the decision-making process for both oncological and reconstructive surgeons. The thickness of the non-glandular breast tissue coverage (BTC), including the skin and the subcutaneous fat layer overlying the anterior lamella of the Methods: We designed a retrospective, multi-reader study on a dataset of 40 unilateral DM cases obtained in the two standard views (CC and MLO). The study set was extracted from all consecutive cases recorded from January 2022 to March 2022 in two Breast Imaging Academic Centers involved in the project (the Breast Unit of the University of Naples Federico II and the Breast Unit of the University of Turin). The robustness of the proposed pre-operative assessments has been determined by deriving the metrics associated with the inter- and intra-observer agreement (P values of the matched measurements, measurement error, repeatability, limits of agreement, correlation) for each testing site and for their possible aggregations. Results: We found a highly satisfactory inter-observer agreement with good correlation among the four senior radiologists' measurements in all positions and on breasts of different density. The intra-observer agreement was also good: no significant differences and good correlation for either one. The method performed well also when used by less expert radiologists, satisfying the requirements for accuracy and repeatability set by the senior team. The analysis of the measured thickness consistently indicated a larger measurement error for the non-dense breast data than for the dense ones. Conclusions: The proposed approach seems to be well-standardized and reproducible, allowing good performance at different levels of experience. It is our hope that this methodological study will assist with preoperative surgical planning by providing a clinical validation tool to estimate mastectomy flap thickness and its impact on preoperative decision-making for optimizing surgical-reconstructive outcomes, both from the oncological and the aesthetic point of view.

Indexed as

breast implantBreast reconstructiondigital mammography (DM)mastectomy flap thicknessmulti-reader study

Identifiers

PMID42445078
PMCPMC13358605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.