ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Beyond survival: empowering adults with congenital heart disease through communication and co-designed education.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) live with lifelong clinical uncertainty, recurrent interventions, and complex decision-making demands. As survival improves, optimal ACHD care increasingly requires approaches that extend beyond biomedical management to support patient empowerment and engagement. This review examines contemporary strategies to support patient empowerment and engagement in ACHD, with a particular focus on communication-based interventions, nurse-led education, and co-designed tools that facilitate shared decision-making. We synthesise contemporary evidence alongside clinical experience from specialist ACHD services. Key approaches include structured communication strategies such as agenda-setting, teach-back, and Question Prompt Lists (QPLs), including the "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) digital tool developed within a tertiary ACHD centre. These interventions may improve patient confidence, facilitate question-asking behaviour, and support more effective consultations. Nurse-led education programmes, transition-focused interventions, and routine psychosocial screening are discussed as integral components of an empowerment framework, particularly during periods of heightened vulnerability such as adolescence, pregnancy, and progression to heart failure. The role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is also considered, not only as outcome assessment tools but also as mechanisms to facilitate structured communication and shared reflection between patients and clinicians. Integrating educational, communicative, and psychosocial strategies within multidisciplinary ACHD care may strengthen continuity of care, improve patient engagement, and support shared decision-making across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.