Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444954›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

Safety and pathologic response of neoadjuvant pulsed electric field ablation and systemic therapy in early-stage resectable lung cancer: case series.

Janani S Reisenauer, David M DiBardino, Gerard J Criner, Stephen J Hunt, Joseph Panaro, Joseph Friedberg, Aaron S Mansfield, Charu Aggarwal, J Nicholas Bodor, Matthew R Callstrom

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05583188 (Neoadjuvant Soft Tissue Ablation Utilizing Aliya™ Pulsed Electric Fields With Systemic Therapy in Early-Stage Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05583188 phase4terminatednot on this map

Neoadjuvant Soft Tissue Ablation Utilizing Aliya™ Pulsed Electric Fields With Systemic Therapy in Early-Stage Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGalvanize Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled5ConditionsNSCLCArmsAliya Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) ablation, Nivolumab plus Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy, Standard of care neoadjuvant therapy, Surgical Resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janani S ReisenauerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David M DiBardinoDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gerard J CrinerDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery at Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stephen J HuntDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joseph PanaroDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joseph FriedbergDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery at Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Aaron S MansfieldDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Charu AggarwalDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Nicholas BodorDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew R CallstromDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The VIGOR study was designed to evaluate the pathologic response of soft tissue ablated with pulsed electric fields (PEFs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are candidates for surgical resection following standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant use of checkpoint inhibitor treatment plus platinum doublet chemotherapy (NCT05583188). The safety of adding PEF to this pathway of care was also evaluated. The primary endpoint was the pathologic response. Secondary endpoints included the rate of R0 (complete) resection, as well as the frequency, duration, and causes of any surgery cancellations or delays. Exploratory endpoints included the profiling of circulating immunocytes post ablation by flow cytometry. The study enrolled 5 patients and PEF energy was successfully delivered to targeted lesions in the lung. No issues were observed when accessing the tumor for delivery of PEF energy, and no device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed. All patients initiated neoadjuvant therapy as planned. Four of five patients underwent surgical resection. Pathological assessment was performed on resected tumors and revealed that out of the four surgical patients three were pathologic complete response (pCR) and one had major pathologic response (MPR). In summary, this study supports the safety and feasibility of PEF ablation in NSCLC patients prior to neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint blockade plus platinum doublet chemotherapy and planned surgical resection.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant therapynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)pulsed electric field ablation (PEF ablation)surgical resection

Identifiers

PMID42444954
PMCPMC13358849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.