ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting sepsis risk in pleural effusion patients.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired sepsis in patients with pleural effusion presents a formidable clinical challenge with high mortality. We aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework for early risk prediction. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU databases). A robust tri-algorithm intersection strategy [Boruta, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE)] was employed to extract core predictors. Nine supervised ML algorithms were systematically evaluated. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were integrated to demystify the "black-box" decision-making process. The optimal model was deployed as a dynamic nomogram and validated via decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: We identified a parsimonious subset of 10 critical predictors. During comprehensive algorithmic competition, the logistic regression (LR) model demonstrated superior discriminative performance and external generalizability. Global SHAP analysis identified baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, pneumonia, and preemptive sedative use as top-tier risk drivers, while highlighting the prognostic value of metabolic markers (anion gap and albumin). Crucially, RCS analysis revealed a distinct non-linear, "U-shaped" dose-response relationship between baseline white blood cell (WBC) counts and sepsis risk, cautioning against the deceptive reassurance of sepsis-associated leukopenia. DCA confirmed that the nomogram provided substantial net clinical benefit. Conclusions: We successfully developed a highly transparent, data-driven ML framework to predict ICU-acquired sepsis risk in pleural effusion patients. The resulting web-based nomogram offers intensive care physicians an actionable bedside tool for personalized risk stratification and timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.