ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Feasibility and safety of awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for operating room extubation after lung transplantation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for operating room (OR) extubation after lung transplantation (LTx). Methods: LTx patients, with intraoperative ECMO and extubation in the OR under ECMO support between January 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025, were classified as the awake ECMO + no mechanical ventilation (MV) group. From September 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023, the LTx patients, who weaned from ECMO in OR and subsequently extubated in the intensive care unit (ICU) were defined as the No ECMO + MV group, while those weaned from ECMO and extubated both in the ICU were classified as ECMO + MV group. Results: Forty-four LTx patients were extubated in the OR under awake ECMO support. After propensity score matching (PSM), 26 LTx patients were respectively included in three groups. No significant differences of vital signs were observed at the end of transplantation among the three groups (P>0.05), except that a lower central venous pressure and lower driving pressure in the ECMO + No-MV group (P=0.05 and P=0.001). The duration of invasive MV and ICU stay were shortest in ECMO + No MV group (P<0.001 and P=0.01). The ECMO-related complications and complications within postoperative 7 days had no difference among three groups (P=0.07 and P=0.053). The total cost of hospitalization was lowest in the No ECMO + MV group (P=0.02). The follow-up 3- and 6-month survivals were lowest in the ECMO + MV group (P<0.001 and P=0.02), while the follow-up 12-month survival was comparable among three groups (P=0.20). Conclusions: Extubated awake veno-arterial (VA)-ECMO is feasible and safe for OR extubation following LTx and may facilitate postoperative recovery by reducing invasive MV and ICU stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.