ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Ultra fast track anesthesia in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection surgery: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), as a cardiovascular critical emergency with an extremely high mortality rate and rapid onset, often requires extracorporeal circulation and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest techniques during surgery, posing challenges to conventional anesthesia management. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ultra fast track anesthesia (UFTA) in individuals undergoing surgery for ATAAD. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ATAAD surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2023 and December 2024. A total of 196 patients were primarily included and 90 patients were ultimately enrolled after strict inclusion and exclusion. The patients were classified according to anesthesia protocol administered: the UFTA group (n=30) and the control (standard general anesthesia) group (n=60). Postoperative complications, recovery parameters, and hospitalization costs were compared between groups. Results: Compared to the control group, the UFTA group demonstrated significantly lower hospitalization costs [234,000±62,000 Conclusions: Among patients undergoing surgery for ATAAD, UFTA appears to be a safe and feasible anesthetic approach that may facilitate enhanced postoperative recovery and reduce overall healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.