Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444844›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Naturalizing perceptual experience: the explanatory power of probabilistic computation and the holographic solution.

Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup, Elizabeth Ann Stoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asger Kirkeby-HinrupDepartment of Philosophy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elizabeth Ann StollWestern Institute of Advanced Study, Denver, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When it comes to consciousness, a central problem is a lack of clarity regarding the ontological status of the phenomenon to be explained. What kind of 'thing in the world' is consciousness? In other words, what will a naturalization of consciousness look like? Naturalization requires that every agreed property of consciousness is made continuous with the properties admitted by the natural sciences. In short, the hard problem will remain hard until we fully understand cortical computation, and the mechanisms by which this biophysical process generates phenomenal content. Here, we evaluate the naturalization project in light of extant debates in consciousness studies. Following this, we introduce a neuro-physically grounded framework for probabilistic neural computation and show how it offers a concrete account of the naturalization of consciousness: the holography solution. The explanatory power of this approach is provided, and we identify several testable predictions. Given the scarcity of (even proposals of) naturalization of consciousness in the field, the holography solution constitutes a significant progress for at least two reasons. Firstly, it is a plausible hypothesis about the way the brain produces perceptual experience. Secondly, even if one is not convinced by our proposal, we nevertheless show that naturalization is

Indexed as

consciousnesshard problem of consciousnessholography solutionneural computationperceptual experienceprobabilistic computationthermodynamic computationThermodynamic Computation Theory (TCT)

Identifiers

PMID42444844
PMCPMC13357652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.