Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in

Bader Alshamsan, Emad Tashkandi, Mohammed Alghamdi, Ali H Alfakeeh, Ali M Alzahrani, Abdulhameed H Alfagih, Mohammad Alkaiyat, Syed Zia Ul Hasan, Husam Shehata, Reham Alghandour and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bader AlshamsanDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Emad TashkandiCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlghamdiOncology Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali H AlfakeehComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Oncology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali M AlzahraniComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Oncology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulhameed H AlfagihComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Oncology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AlkaiyatDepartment of Medical Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard for Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Syed Zia Ul HasanPrince Faisal Cancer Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Qassim Health Cluster, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Husam ShehataDepartment of Medical Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard for Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reham AlghandourMedical Oncology Department, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad ZuhdySurgical Oncology Department, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AbdelhalimPrince Faisal Cancer Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Qassim Health Cluster, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A AlgarniDepartment of Medical Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard for Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Kanan AlshammariDepartment of Medical Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard for Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited regional data available. This study evaluated outcomes, treatment patterns, and prognostic factors in a multicenter cohort of patients with Methods: A retrospective cohort of 271 patients with Results: Systemic therapy was administered to 211 patients (77.9%). Among the entire cohort, 92 patients (33.9%) received second-line therapy, 25 (9.2%) received third-line therapy, and 8 (3.0%) received fourth-line therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 months (95% CI, 8.4-10.6). On multivariable analysis, inferior OS was independently associated with poor ECOG performance status (PS 4: HR 4.08, P = 0.031), age 15-39 years (HR 4.44, P < 0.001), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HR 1.91, P = 0.017), cirrhosis (HR 3.13, P = 0.004), and elevated CEA (HR 1.92, P = 0.003). Patients with disease control had a 71% lower hazard of death (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.47) and longer median OS (16.0 vs 7.7 months). Conclusions: Advanced BTC in Saudi Arabia demonstrates poor outcomes, with survival strongly influenced by performance status, age, tumor site, cirrhosis, and biomarkers. Treatment exposure was limited, with only one-third receiving second-line therapy, highlighting the urgent need for expanded access to immunotherapy and molecular profiling.

Indexed as

biliary tract cancercholangiocarcinomagallbladder cancermolecular profilingprognostic factorsSaudi Arabiasurvival outcomessystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID42444838
PMCPMC13357194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.