Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444790›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026

Penicillin or Ceftriaxone for Neurosyphilis in People With HIV: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study in Mexico.

Rodrigo Ville Benavides, Héctor Rivera-Villegas, Obed Ocampo-Valdez, Rafael Franco-Cendejas, Jaime Federico Andrade-Villanueva, Luz Alicia González-Hernández, Pedro Martínez-Ayala, Andrea Cárdenas-Ortega, Paulina Carreño-Pérez, Jezer Lezama-Mora and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rodrigo Ville BenavidesDepartamento de Infectología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-831X
Héctor Rivera-VillegasDepartamento de Infectología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9735-3892
Obed Ocampo-ValdezDepartamento de Infectología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1030-6179
Rafael Franco-CendejasSubdirección de Investigación Biomédica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, México City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1574-1138
Jaime Federico Andrade-VillanuevaUnidad de VIH, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde," Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-655X
Luz Alicia González-HernándezUnidad de VIH, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde," Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7163-0566
Pedro Martínez-AyalaUnidad de VIH, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde," Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0505-6340
Andrea Cárdenas-OrtegaClínica de Inmunocompromiso por Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIENI), Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1827-3283
Paulina Carreño-PérezClínica de Inmunocompromiso por Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIENI), Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3809-9651
Jezer Lezama-MoraClínica de Sífilis, Clínica Especializada Condesa Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Carlos Rodríguez-AldamaDepartamento de Infectología, Clínica Especializada Condesa Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-9879
Edgar Pérez-BarragánDepartamento de Infectología, Clínica Especializada Condesa Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3839-1567
Pamela Alatorre-FernándezDepartamento de Infectología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8873-8573
Estefanía Sienra-IrachetaDepartamento de Infectología, Hospital General Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6703-661X
Ana Patricia Rodríguez-ZuluetaDepartamento de Infectología, Hospital General Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-7890
Norma Eréndira Rivera-MartínezDepartamento de Infectología, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca (HRAEO) IMSS Bienestar, Oaxaca de Juárez, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-1234
Brenda Crabtree-RamírezDepartamento de Infectología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2587-1123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neurosyphilis, ocular syphilis, and otosyphilis occur more frequently among people with HIV-1 and are associated with higher morbidity and treatment failure. Intravenous penicillin G remains the standard therapy but requires hospitalization or prolonged intravenous access, creating barriers that are amplified in resource-limited settings facing recurrent penicillin shortages. Ceftriaxone is a potential alternative; however, comparative data in people with HIV are limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults with HIV at 5 public hospitals and 2 outpatient HIV clinics in Mexico (2015-2024). Participants had confirmed neurosyphilis, ocular syphilis, or otosyphilis. Participants received intravenous penicillin G (18-24 million IU/day) or ceftriaxone (1-2 g/day) for 10-14 days. The primary outcome was early serological response (ESR), defined as a ≥4-fold nontreponemal titer decline or seroreversion at 6 months. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (39 pairs, n = 78), followed by logistic regression in the matched cohort. Results: Of 143 participants, 104 (73%) received intravenous penicillin G and 39 (27%) ceftriaxone. In the matched cohort, ESR occurred in 74.4% of penicillin-treated participants and 71.8% of ceftriaxone-treated participants (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval .32-2.40; Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort of people with HIV diagnosed with neurosyphilis, ocular syphilis, or otosyphilis, ceftriaxone showed comparable ESR to intravenous penicillin G. These findings support ceftriaxone as a reasonable alternative when standard therapy is limited by penicillin shortages, limited inpatient capacity, or financial constraints.

Indexed as

ceftriaxoneHIVlimited-resource settingsneurosyphilispenicillin

Identifiers

PMID42444790
PMCPMC13361709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.