ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Systematic Review of Bilateral Ocular Trauma: Considerations for Future Whole-eye Transplantation.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bilateral ocular trauma (BLOT) is a rare but severe injury pattern associated with high-energy mechanisms and poor visual outcomes. As interest in vascularized composite allotransplantation grows, particularly following the first combined face transplantation (FT) and whole-eye transplantation (WET), a clearer understanding of BLOT injury patterns, interventions, and outcomes is needed to provide context for future discussions of bilateral WET. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and MEDLINE. Studies published through June 2024 were included if they reported patient-level data on BLOT mechanisms, injury type, outcomes, and surgical management. Results: A total of 268 patients with BLOT were identified, predominantly young men (72.4%) with a mean age of 29.9 years. Motor vehicle accidents (31.6%), explosions (21.4%), and fireworks (9.8%) were the leading mechanisms. Open-globe injuries (51.8%) were more frequent than closed-globe injuries, and the cornea (26.5%), limbus (15.5%), and lens (11.6%) were the most affected ocular regions. Globe-sacrificing procedures such as enucleation (2.1%) and evisceration (1.6%) were infrequent, and among studies reporting visual outcomes, bilateral blindness occurred in 38.7% of cases. Conclusions: Patients with BLOT were predominantly young men exposed to motor vehicle accidents and explosive trauma and, despite a high rate of bilateral blindness, often retained intact globes. Although vision restoration has not yet been achieved, these findings provide context for ongoing discussions of bilateral WET, whether performed in isolation or in combination with FT, within the evolving field of vascularized composite allotransplantation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.