ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2026
Exploring Admission Decisions in Psychiatrists in Emergency Services: A Vignette-based Qualitative Study.
Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Decision-making regarding inpatient hospitalization in the emergency care setting is complex and depends on several factors that have been poorly studied. A better understanding of the impact of subjective and objective factors on decision-making is a clear clinical need. This article explored the factors influencing psychiatrists' decision-making regarding emergency room admission across various situations. Methods: This study used an exploratory qualitative research design. Focus group discussions, centered on case vignettes, were held with psychiatry trainees and licensed psychiatrists. These were audio-recorded with the participants' permission, transcribed, coded, and later analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Five themes emerged (prioritizing patient safety by risk assessment, institution-related factors, resource constraints, clinician-related factors, and the role of family). These themes highlighted the relevant situational factors that influence decision-making regarding hospitalization, in addition to the presence of clinical risk. Conclusion: Indian psychiatrists do not base decisions regarding admissions to the emergency room on clinical assessments alone. They are cognizant of various contextual, social, and cultural factors as they navigate competing ethical imperatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.