Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Psychological and behavioral processes in stroke survivors with recovery exceeding prognostic expectations: a qualitative study of positive deviance.

Ryu Kobayashi, Norikazu Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryu KobayashiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan.
Norikazu KobayashiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Some patients demonstrate exceptional post-stroke recovery beyond prognostic expectations; this phenomenon is referred to as positive deviance. Understanding how such recovery is perceived in clinical practice may provide insights for improving rehabilitation. Aim: This study aimed to explore how occupational therapists perceive and interpret psychological and behavioral processes observed among stroke survivors whose activities of daily living (ADL) improvement exceeded prognostic predictions. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight occupational therapists working in a rehabilitation ward. The analysis focused on psychological and behavioral processes in patients with post-stroke ADL improvement beyond prognostic expectations, as perceived by the therapists. Data were analyzed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Six themes were identified as common patterns of psychological and behavioral processes among the patients: 1) maintaining own identity based on occupation; 2) positive and flexible problem-solving orientation; 3) mental fortitude to face challenges; 4) self-management toward goal attainment; 5) development of self-efficacy through accumulated successful experiences; and 6) proactive use of social support. Conclusions: The psychological and behavioral processes associated with positive deviance, as perceived by occupational therapists, provide a clinically grounded perspective on stroke recovery and may inform the development of rehabilitation strategies to enhance recovery outcomes.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingoccupational therapistpositive devianceprognosisreflexive thematic analysisstroke

Identifiers

PMID42444758
PMCPMC13357529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.