Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444757›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Procurement architecture as a determinant of rehabilitation system performance: insights from Ukraine's prosthetics sector.

Aadrian Sullivan, Volodymyr Golyk, Marlee Elizabeth Quinn, Oleh Karpov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aadrian SullivanConsultant, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Volodymyr GolykRehabilitation and Disability Unit, WHO Country Office in Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Marlee Elizabeth QuinnRehabilitation and Disability Unit, WHO Country Office in Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Oleh KarpovRehabilitation and Disability Unit, WHO Country Office in Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to assistive products remains highly uneven across health systems. Policy discussions in rehabilitation frequently emphasize workforce development, service delivery models, and clinical standards. Less attention has been given to the institutional mechanisms through which assistive products are procured and supplied. Ukraine's prosthetics sector provides a contemporary illustration of how procurement systems influence rehabilitation service delivery. Following the escalation of armed conflict in 2022, Ukraine experienced a sharp increase in demand for prosthetic services. National programmes expanded rapidly to support individuals requiring rehabilitation and assistive technologies. In this context, procurement arrangements - including decentralized purchasing across multiple providers and reliance on imported prosthetic components, have highlighted structural challenges affecting supply chain coordination, pricing transparency, and system scalability. This paper argues that procurement architecture represents an under-recognized determinant of rehabilitation system performance. Drawing on insights from Ukraine's prosthetics sector, the paper explores how fragmented procurement arrangements can reduce cost efficiency in access to assistive technologies even when financing and service delivery capacity expand. It further outlines procurement reform principles that may strengthen rehabilitation systems, including pooled purchasing mechanisms, framework agreements, demand forecasting integration, and digital procurement platforms.

Indexed as

assistive technologyprocurementprosthetics and orthoticsrehabilitation systemsUkraine

Identifiers

PMID42444757
PMCPMC13357667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.