ArticleRheumatology and immunology research2026
The 60
Article in Rheumatology and immunology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been more than 60 years since the development of Rome criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). These criteria wonderfully delineated the clinical pictures of AS, and since then, tremendous works has paved the way for the study and management of AS patients. However, their low sensitivity, specificity and the potential for a delay diagnosis remain major problems of these criteria. Over the past six decades, new classification criteria had been developed to address these issues. As is often the case, new solutions bring new challenges. Avoiding over-diagnosis and over-treatment become a crucial contemporary issue. Hopefully, new modifications of classification criteria are on their way to better defining and treating AS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.