Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444724›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and immunology research2026

Trends in research on fatigue in rheumatology: Bibliometric analysis.

Zulal Tatar, Elif Gur Kabul, Bilge Basakci Calik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and immunology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zulal TatarDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Elif Gur KabulDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Usak University, Usak, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3209-1499
Bilge Basakci CalikFaculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the studies on fatigue symptoms in rheumatology using bibliometric methods and to determine current trends and focal points. Methods: The dataset for this study was created from articles published between 1983 and 2024 accessed Results: A total of 624 articles were included in the study. The highest publication productivity was seen in the United States with 186 publications. The journals "Journal of Rheumatology" and "Rheumatology" both ranked first in publication productivity with 68 articles each. The most commonly used keyword was "rheumatoid arthritis". The journal with the highest total citation amount and cumulative publication production was "Journal of Rheumatology". Trending topics were seen tofacitinib, patient-reported outcome measures, and psoritic arthritis. Authors with one publication on fatigue in rheumatic diseases constituted 79% of all authors, authors with two publications constituted 12%, and authors with three or more publications constituted 4%. The most globally cited study was Wolfe, F. Conclusion: The literature on fatigue in the field of rheumatology contains deficiencies in better understanding the pathophysiology of fatigue, its management and treatment. At the same time, in recent years, fatigue has moved away from parameters such as muscle strength, pain and disease activity and towards patient reported outcomes. The increase in studies determining the validity and reliability of fatigue questionnaires in rheumatic diseases is also striking.

Indexed as

fatiguerheumatic diseaserheumatology

Identifiers

PMID42444724
PMCPMC13358952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.