Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444718›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and immunology research2026

Comparative diagnostic performance of ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective study from a tertiary care centre in south India.

Sabarinath Mahadevan, Balakrishnan Navaneethakrishnan, Mahabaleshwar Mamadapur, Harshwardhan Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and immunology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabarinath MahadevanInstitute of Rheumatology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Balakrishnan NavaneethakrishnanInstitute of Rheumatology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Mahabaleshwar MamadapurDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, JSS Medical College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Research, Mysore 570004, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-2418
Harshwardhan PatilDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Research, Mysuru 570004, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) accounts for 10%-20% of overall lupus cases. Data on the epidemiology of cSLE in our population are limited, and there are no exclusive classification criteria tailored for childhood lupus. The primary objective was to describe the epidemiological and clinical profile of cSLE in our centre. The secondary objective was to evaluate the performance of the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR), the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC), and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/ American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) 2019 classification criteria in cSLE. Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical record review of children with a clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at our tertiary care centre between January 2024 and July 2024. Children with overlap connective tissue diseases were excluded. All three classification criteria were applied and compared against the gold standard of physician diagnosis. Clinical and laboratory features were analysed, and the sensitivity of each set of criteria was calculated. Results: Sixty-six children with clinically confirmed cSLE were included. The female-to-male ratio was 5.6: 1, with a median age at symptom onset of 15.5 years and a median diagnostic delay of 6 months. The most frequent manifestations were fever (83.0%), alopecia (70.0%), arthritis (64.0%), oral ulcers (39.0%), acute cutaneous lupus (67.0%), leukopenia (24.0%), and biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (31.0%). The SLICC 2012 criteria demonstrated the highest sensitivity (95.5%), followed by EULAR/ACR 2019 (93.9%) and ACR 1997 (84.8%). Notably, 4.5% of clinically diagnosed cases did not fulfil any existing criteria. Alopecia, hypocomplementemia, and biopsy-proven nephritis were frequently missed by ACR 1997 but captured by SLICC 2012. Conclusion: The SLICC 2012 criteria showed superior sensitivity compared to ACR 1997, while EULAR/ACR 2019 also performed well. However, a small subset of clinically diagnosed cSLE cases remained unclassified by all criteria, highlighting the need for pediatric-specific classification frameworks.

Indexed as

ACR 1997childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosusclassification criteriaEULAR/ACR 2019sensitivitySLICC 2012systemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID42444718
PMCPMC13358950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.