ArticleRSC advances2026
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) is susceptible to irreversible membrane fouling caused by iron ions, which severely degrades desalination performance. To mitigate this bottleneck, corncob-derived activated carbons (CCACs) offering low preparation cost, balanced performance, and stability have been developed as core electrode materials. Given the detrimental impact of iron, this study systematically compared two fouling control strategies: pretreatment filtration (Model I) and in-channel biochar dosing (Model II). The results demonstrate that introducing high-surface-area modified biochar particles directly into the flow channel provides additional deposition sites for iron-based foulants, thereby extending iron removal capacity. This
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.