ArticleBMJ public health2026
Health effects of an increased federal minimum wage among US low-wage-earning adults: a difference-in-differences analysis in a population-based cohort.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The current US federal minimum wage (US$7.25) translates to incomes below the poverty limit for full-time workers. Prior studies do not provide clear evidence that increasing wages can improve health, but there are limited long-term findings from the low-wage workers directly affected. Methods: We estimated the health effects of the most recent increased federal minimum wage policy change, which was fully implemented in 2009, comparing residents of states that did and did not rely on the change. Low-income Panel Study of Income Dynamics participants between 1999 and 2019 were included if they were interviewed both before and after the policy change, and they or their partner relied on an hourly wage that was ≤150% of the minimum wage. Adjusted two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences models compared residents of states that relied on the federal minimum wage change in 2009 (1472 observations, 20 states) to those in states with higher minimum wages (1854 observations, 24 states). Results: Participants were, on average, 29 years old in 1999 and typically followed for 9.6 years (n=699). Most were female (73%) and Black (50%). The federal policy change temporarily narrowed the mean minimum wage gap between exposed and comparator states. In adjusted fixed-effects models, the federal minimum wage policy change reduced psychological distress (difference-in-differences coefficient=-1.027, p<0.01). There was no effect on body mass index, self-rated health or number of chronic conditions (difference-in-differences interaction term p values >0.05). Conclusions: These results provide timely evidence suggesting that increased federal minimum wage policy changes may advance mental health equity by reducing psychological distress over 10 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.