Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444665›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Between help and hindrance: a qualitative study on inclusion of birth companions in closed, invited and contested spaces within maternity care settings in Malawi.

Bianca Kandeya, Wanangwa Chimwaza, Claudia Hanson, Dorcus Kiwanuka Henriksson, William Stones, Effie Chipeta, Helle Mølsted Alvesson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bianca KandeyaCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8829-4618
Wanangwa ChimwazaCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden.
Dorcus Kiwanuka HenrikssonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden.
William StonesCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi.
Effie ChipetaCentre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-3443
Helle Mølsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-7203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Birth companionship is widely recognised as a key component of respectful maternity care, with well-documented benefits for maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, in low-resource settings like Malawi, its integration into facility-based care remains limited and uneven due to systemic, infrastructural and interpersonal challenges. The study aimed to explore how birth companionship is negotiated in closed, invited and contested spaces within maternity care settings. Methods: This qualitative exploratory study, nested within the ALERT (Action Leveraging Evidence to Reduce Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa) project, was conducted in one government and one faith-based hospital in Malawi. 65 Participants were purposively sampled: 24 postpartum women, 20 birth companions and 21 maternity care providers. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focused group discussions with providers and birth companions, 7-day provider diaries and 72 hours of observations involving 16 birthing mothers and 16 maternity care providers. Transcripts were uploaded into NVivo V.14 for coding and data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, applying Gaventa's Spaces of Power framework for interpretation. Results: Findings show that companion inclusion was overlooked in maternity ward design and policy, leaving involvement unstructured and dependent on provider discretion. Provider-centred routines, lack of guidance and training, overcrowding, restricted visiting hours and inadequate facilities reinforced closed spaces and limited continuous support. In invited spaces, companions offered emotional and practical support, but participation remained conditional, poorly acknowledged and shaped by provider needs. In contested spaces, unclear roles generated tension over authority and responsibility as companions sought visibility, questioned decisions or mediated between women and providers, often risking reprimand. Conclusion: The integration of birth companionship in Malawi's maternity care system remains conditional and inconsistently practised. Addressing this requires clear policy frameworks, role orientation for companions, infrastructural investment and provider training. Interventions should promote well defined inclusive spaces where companions are empowered and midwives supported, thereby advancing respectful, woman-centred care.

Indexed as

AttitudeCommunicationethics

Identifiers

PMID42444665
PMCPMC13358271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.